Connect with us

Latest News

EFCC re-arraigns Atiku’s son-in-law, Babalele over alleged $140.000 money laundering

Published

on

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, Lagos Zonal office, has re-arraigned Abdullahi Babalele over alleged $140,000.00 money laundering.

Babalele was made to appear before Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke of the Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos.

TIMELY POST learnt that Babalele, a son-in-law to a former Vice President and People’s Democratic Party, PDP, candidate in the 2019 presidential election, Atiku Abubakar, allegedly persuaded Bashir Mohammed, a Bureau De Change, BDC, operator, to make a cash payment of the sum of $140,000 without going through any financial institution, an offence contrary to Section 18(c) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 as amended and punishable under Section 16(2)(b) of the same Act.

EFCC spokesman, Wilson Uwujaren said this in a statement in Abuja.

One of the counts reads: “That you, Abdullahi Babalele, on or about the 20th day of February, 2019 in Nigeria, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, procured Basir Mohammed to make a cash payment of the sum of $140,000.00 (One Hundred and Forty Thousand United States
Dollars) without going through a financial institution, which sum exceeded the amount authorized by the Law and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18(C) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 as amended and punishable under Section 16(2)(b) of the same Act.”

But the defendant reportedly pleaded not guilty to the charge preferred against him.

It was under this consideration that the prosecution counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo, informed the court of the existing bail earlier granted the defendant and applied for the commencement of the trial.

Also, Counsel to the defendant, Mike Ozekhome, SAN, informed the court about an application before the court for the release of the international passport of the defendant.

Further, the defendant’s counsel told the court that he had attached some medical reports showing that the defendant is ill and that “he will need to undergo treatment abroad.“ My Lord, the health issues are life- threatening.”

Ozekhome, on this premise, urged the court to grant the application and allow the defendant to travel abroad for three weeks.

The application, however, did not settle down well with Oyedepo who opposed the application and urged the court to go through the medical report.

He also pointed out, “there is no existing appointment made to see any doctors abroad.

“The report shows that the defendant has no issue of trauma, diabetes, high blood pressure or otherwise.”.

He, therefore, urged the court to refuse the application, saying there was no material evidence before the court to show that the defendant was in distress.

In his ruling, Justice Aneke adjourned the case to October 11, for ruling.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

44 workers sacked in Benue property company

Published

on

The Benue Investment and Property Company (BIPC), on Tuesday announced the sack of 44 workers it claimed were redundant.

Mr Alex Adum, its Managing Director, who announced this at his first accountability press briefing in Makurdi, said that their employment followed due processes, but “lacked business needs”.

According to him, the reduction in the workforce is part of an ongoing restructuring in the company, NAN reports

“All the affected staff have been redundant; I inherited a total of 204 workers, among those sacked were three Executive Directors and four General Managers.

“In 2016, BIPC had 66 staff; between 2016 and 2019, an additional 150 staff were employed,” he said.

Adums said that the company’s monthly wage bill rose to N37 million due to the number of employees.

The managing director said that he was aware of the criticisms the sack would attract, but declared that he was “doing it in good faith, and in the interest of Benue”.

He said that the company’s shares and assets had hugely depreciated due to misapplication of managerial principles.

“Previous administrations refused to apply sound managerial principles; they made the company a social service extension centre.

“They watched while the company collapsed, and left a lot of liabilities for the government to battle with,” he fumed.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Supreme court fixes date to resume FG, senator Kashamu’s extradition legal battle

Published

on

The Supreme Court has fixed October 17 to resume hearing in an appeal filed by former Senator Buruji Kashamu challenging the Federal government’s move to extradite him to the United States of America (USA) for trial in an alleged hard drug trafficking offence

The long drawn legal battle started in 2014 by Kashamu at the Federal high court to thwart the request of the American government that he be extradited to USA to answer alleged criminal charges filed against him about heroine drug importation into the country.

It was gathered that ten other persons said to have been involved in the alleged drug offence have been tried, convicted and sentenced to various prison terms while Kashamu reportedly escaped and ran back to Nigeria prompting the extradition request against him.

The Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) are the key respondents in the two appeals filed by Kashamu to stop the federal government from executing two Appeal Court judgments granted against him.

This is coming as the AGF is making moves to challenge together, the multiple lawsuits filed by Kashamu in various courts on ground of abuse of court processes and use of the suits to harass the Federal government and the NDLEA.

Apart from the two appeals pending in Supreme Court Kashamu has filed two fresh ones at the Federal high court in Abuja before Justice Okon Abang and another one at the Lagos division of the court before Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke.

The hearing date has been communicated to parties involved in the legal tussle through issuance of hearing notice.

The Apex Court is to review the two judgments delivered in favour of the Federal Government by the Lagos division of Court of Appeal on May 4, 2018.

Kashamu had in his notice of appeal to Supreme Court complained that the Court of Appeal erred in law by voiding and setting aside the two judgments of the Federal High Court, Abuja which barred Federal Government from extraditing him to America.

The ex-senator is praying the Apex Court to set aside the decisions of the Court of Appeal as they affected him.

But government through the Attorney-General of the Federation, AGF, has joined issues with him over a counter prayer that the Supreme Court should uphold the judgments of the Court of Appeal meant for his extradition.

The AGF claimed that the Appeal Court was right in setting aside two judgments of the High Court because they were based on hearsay evidence of Kashamu before the court.

The AGF urged the Supreme Court to allow the judgments of the Court of Appeal to enable the Federal government extradite the Senator to USA to prove his innocence or otherwise in the hard drug trafficking criminal charge filed against him by the American government since 2015 when he was alleged to have escaped to Nigeria.

Prince Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, is leading the legal team of the lawmaker while Chief Emeka Ngige, SAN, is leading the Federal government legal team at the Apex Court.

The Court of Appeal had on May 4, 2018 delivered a judgment in favour of the federal government to extradite Kashamu who had engaged government in a long drawn legal battle since 2014.

The appellate court in the two separate judgments voided and set aside all orders made by a Federal High Court between 2014 and 2017 restraining the government from proceeding with the extradition.

Justice Joseph Ikyeghi in the judgments marked CA/L/1030/15 and CA/L/1030A/15 in the appeal filed by the AGF held that the orders granted Kashamu by Justice Okon Abang were invalid and unknown to laws because they were based on hearsays and speculations by Senator Kashamu.

The court held that the hearsay, saying that former President Olusegun Obasanjo was instigating the extradition was not established under any law.

The appeal court said that an affidavit deposed to by Kashamu on the issue was worthless and not in compliance with Evidence Act because the senator himself claimed that he was told by several persons who were not called to testify in court.

Justice Ikyeghi held that Justice Abang in his two judgments on the issue erred in law by playing undue reliance on affidavit that contravened Evidence Act to give judgment against the Federal government.

Consequently, the order of injunction stopping the extraction process was voided and set aside.

Justice Ikyeghi had agreed with counsel to the Federal Government Chief Emeka Ngige, SAN, that a statutory body like the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) can only be prohibited from performing its statutory functions based on facts and not hearsays and speculations as in the instant case.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Supreme court fixes date to resume FG, senator Kashamu’s extradition legal battle

Published

on

The Supreme Court has fixed October 17 to resume hearing in an appeal filed by former Senator Buruji Kashamu challenging the Federal government’s move to extradite him to the United States of America (USA) for trial in an alleged hard drug trafficking offence

The long drawn legal battle started in 2014 by Kashamu at the Federal high court to thwart the request of the American government that he be extradited to USA to answer alleged criminal charges filed against him about heroine drug importation into the country.

It was gathered that ten other persons said to have been involved in the alleged drug offence have been tried, convicted and sentenced to various prison terms while Kashamu reportedly escaped and ran back to Nigeria prompting the extradition request against him.

The Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) are the key respondents in the two appeals filed by Kashamu to stop the federal government from executing two Appeal Court judgments granted against him.

This is coming as the AGF is making moves to challenge together, the multiple lawsuits filed by Kashamu in various courts on ground of abuse of court processes and use of the suits to harass the Federal government and the NDLEA.

Apart from the two appeals pending in Supreme Court Kashamu has filed two fresh ones at the Federal high court in Abuja before Justice Okon Abang and another one at the Lagos division of the court before Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke.

The hearing date has been communicated to parties involved in the legal tussle through issuance of hearing notice.

The Apex Court is to review the two judgments delivered in favour of the Federal Government by the Lagos division of Court of Appeal on May 4, 2018.

Kashamu had in his notice of appeal to Supreme Court complained that the Court of Appeal erred in law by voiding and setting aside the two judgments of the Federal High Court, Abuja which barred Federal Government from extraditing him to America.

The ex-senator is praying the Apex Court to set aside the decisions of the Court of Appeal as they affected him.

But government through the Attorney-General of the Federation, AGF, has joined issues with him over a counter prayer that the Supreme Court should uphold the judgments of the Court of Appeal meant for his extradition.

The AGF claimed that the Appeal Court was right in setting aside two judgments of the High Court because they were based on hearsay evidence of Kashamu before the court.

The AGF urged the Supreme Court to allow the judgments of the Court of Appeal to enable the Federal government extradite the Senator to USA to prove his innocence or otherwise in the hard drug trafficking criminal charge filed against him by the American government since 2015 when he was alleged to have escaped to Nigeria.

Prince Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, is leading the legal team of the lawmaker while Chief Emeka Ngige, SAN, is leading the Federal government legal team at the Apex Court.

The Court of Appeal had on May 4, 2018 delivered a judgment in favour of the federal government to extradite Kashamu who had engaged government in a long drawn legal battle since 2014.

The appellate court in the two separate judgments voided and set aside all orders made by a Federal High Court between 2014 and 2017 restraining the government from proceeding with the extradition.

Justice Joseph Ikyeghi in the judgments marked CA/L/1030/15 and CA/L/1030A/15 in the appeal filed by the AGF held that the orders granted Kashamu by Justice Okon Abang were invalid and unknown to laws because they were based on hearsays and speculations by Senator Kashamu.

The court held that the hearsay, saying that former President Olusegun Obasanjo was instigating the extradition was not established under any law.

The appeal court said that an affidavit deposed to by Kashamu on the issue was worthless and not in compliance with Evidence Act because the senator himself claimed that he was told by several persons who were not called to testify in court.

Justice Ikyeghi held that Justice Abang in his two judgments on the issue erred in law by playing undue reliance on affidavit that contravened Evidence Act to give judgment against the Federal government.

Consequently, the order of injunction stopping the extraction process was voided and set aside.

Justice Ikyeghi had agreed with counsel to the Federal Government Chief Emeka Ngige, SAN, that a statutory body like the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) can only be prohibited from performing its statutory functions based on facts and not hearsays and speculations as in the instant case.

Continue Reading

Like Us OnFacebook

Trending